Accessibility testing
- Tests for people using assistive technology
- Covers contrast, focus, captions and much more
- Assumes the visitor is let in
- Reports against WCAG success criteria
Compare · Accessibility testing
Accessibility checkers like axe, WAVE and Lighthouse test pages against WCAG: labels, names, structure and contrast. Browser agents read the same accessibility tree screen readers do, so a lot of that work helps AI agents directly. But an accessible page can still turn agents away at the door or hide its prices from them.
At a glance
| Question | Ghost Agent Lab | Accessibility testing |
|---|---|---|
| Main job | Make sure AI agents can get in, read and use your site | Make sure people with disabilities can use your site |
| Checks that buttons, links and fields have names | ✓ | ✓ |
| WCAG conformance and colour contrast | – | ✓ |
| Checks whether bot protection or robots.txt blocks AI agents | ✓ | – |
| Checks content and prices are readable without JavaScript | ✓ | – |
| Tests checkout or sign-up with a real AI agent | ✓ | – |
| Shows which AI agents visit, from your logs | ✓ | – |
The difference
Better together
Every name you add to an icon button or a form field helps screen reader users and AI agents alike. Keep your accessibility testing, and use Ghost Agent Lab for the agent-only parts. Accessibility work is agent readiness work.
FAQ
It's a strong start, because agents use the same names and labels. But WCAG doesn't cover whether your bot protection blocks AI assistants, whether prices are in the HTML, or whether an agent can finish checkout.
Not as an accessibility tool: it doesn't check contrast or report WCAG conformance. It checks the accessibility basics agents rely on, like named buttons and labelled fields.
More comparisons
Take the two-minute tour, or start a 30-day trial with your own logs.